Exploring obstacles in digital transformation - Lund University
Publikationer - Högskolan i Gävle
67-93 Published by: Management Information Systems Research Center, University of Minnesota Stable URL: JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps "A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems," MIS Quarterly (23:1), pp. 67-93. Google Scholar Kvasny, L., and Keil, M. 2006. A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems Heinz K. Klein Michael D. Myers Standards, not rules For interpretive(and hermeneutic) field studies Principles are not a pre-defined set of criteria Improvement over status quo Hope to ignite some debate Bring on the principles! Recommended Citation Klein, Heinz and Myers, Michael. 1999. "A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems," MIS Quarterly, (23: 1).
This study presents an initial set of findings from an empirical study of social processes, technical system configurations, organisational contexts and interrelationships that give rise to open software. The focus is directed at understanding the requirements for open software development efforts, and how the development of these requirements differs from those traditional to software “A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems” Heinz K. Klein and Michael D. Myers (Volume 23, Number 1, March 1999) Paper of the Year for 1998 “The Merchant of Prato — Revisited : Toward a Third Rationality of Information Systems” Kuldeep Kumar, Han G. van Dissel, and Paola Bielli Our article focuses on understanding how this set of principles has informed research articles published in two of the highest-ranked information systems journals and, specifically, questions if these principles have been translated into common practices when conducting interpretive research in the field of information systems and whether authors incorporate them explicitly when they 2010-11-02 A set of principles for the conduct and evaluation of interpretive field research in information systems is proposed, along with their philosophical rationale. The usefulness of the principles is illustrated by evaluating three published interpretive field studies drawn from the IS research literature. tive field studies. A set of principles for the con-duct and evaluation of interpretive field research in information systems is proposed, along with their philosophical rationale.
Klein, H. K., and Myers, M. D. 1999. "A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems," MIS Quarterly (23:1), pp. 67-93.
Forskningsparadigm inom Informationssystem Pär Ågerfalk
av S Sirris · 2019 · Citerat av 2 — within the field of organizational studies (Scott, 2014), and in the sociology of professions functional approach based on activities leads to various sets of role Healthcare organizations are considered complex systems that are In principle, this does not hinder the study of the church as an organization. av P Lundin · Citerat av 5 — and time-saving methods such as witness seminars and Internet collection of cm thick evaluation study of the TIDAS project.
INSTITUTIONEN FÖR TILLÄMPAD
A set of principles for the conduct and evaluation of interpretive field research in information systems is proposed, along with their philosophical rationale. The usefulness of the principles is illustrated by evaluating three published interpretive field studies drawn from the IS research literature. "A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems," MIS Quarterly (23:1), pp. 67-93.
Several pieces of interpretive studies have been published since. »References on Interpretive Research . Klein, H. K. and Michael D. Myers. "A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems," MIS Quarterly, Special Issue on Intensive Research (23:1), 1999, pp. 67-93. A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems, MIS Quarterly, 1999, Heinz K. Klein and Michael D. Myers - IS research can be classified as interpretive if it is assumed that our knowledge of reality is gained only through social constructions such a language, consciousness, shared meanings, documents, tools, and other artifacts.
Citalopram somn
av F Karlsson · 2007 · Citerat av 11 — S. Brinkkemper, Method engineering: engineering of information systems Myers, A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in While the conventionsfor evaluating information systemscase studies A set of principles for the conduct andevaluationof interpretive field research in Qualitative Research in Information Systems. London: A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in Information A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems · H. Klein, M. Myers. Sociology, Computer Science; MIS Q. av A Svensson · Citerat av 6 — A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating. Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems.
A set of principles for the con- however, researchers, reviewers, and editors have duct and evaluation of interpretive field research raised questions about how interpretive field in information systems is proposed, along with research should be conducted and how its quality
A set of principles for the con- duct and evaluation of interpretive field research in information systems is proposed, along with their philosophical rationale. The usefulness of the principles is illustrated by evaluating three published interpretive field studies drawn from the IS research literature. While the conventions for evaluating information systems case studies conducted according to the natural science model of social science are now widely accepted, this is not the case for interpre-tive field studies.
Anneli larsson väröbacka
bedriva handel
transport historia
godakanda herbals contact no
skatteavdrag semesterlön
allmänpsykiatriska mottagningen 1 västerås
Forskningsparadigm inom Informationssystem Pär Ågerfalk
Klein, H. K., & Myers, M. D. (1999). A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems. MIS Quarterly, Special Issue An example of the effort to advance the legitimacy of studies grounded in an interpretive position is the set of principles suggested by Klein and Myers (1999), which applies mostly to hermeneutics.However, because not all interpretive studies are built on a hermeneutical philosophical base, they recommended that other researchers, representing other forms of interpretivism, suggest additional principles. A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems Heinz K. Klein Michael D. Myers Standards, not rules For interpretive(and hermeneutic) field studies Principles are not a pre-defined set of criteria Improvement over status quo Hope to ignite some debate Bring on the principles!
Gymnasiearbete rapport exempel
fitness24seven örebro öppettider
Contents - IDA - Yumpu
Naturalistic inquiry: Social phenomena must be studied within their natural setting. “When people are invited to participate in research, there is a strong belief that it should be their choice based on their understanding of what the study is about, and what the risks and benefits of the study are,” said Dr. Christine Grady, chief of the NIH Clinical Center Department of Bioethics, to Clinical Center Radio in a podcast. EVALUATION IS PART OF THE FABRIC OF THE WILLIAM AND FLORA HEWLETT Foundation. It is referenced in our guiding principles. It is an explicit element of our outcome-focused grantmaking. And evaluation is practiced with increasing frequency, intensity, and skill across all programs and several administrative departments in the Foundation. C) There are ethical guidelines set forth by the Belmont Report detailing how far scientists can go in their pursuit of knowledge.